SBF的律师希望就加密利他主义和多动症向陪审员提问
(SBFs lawyers want to quiz jurors on crypto altruism and ADHD)

Published: 2023-09-13


1. 主议题：山姆·班克曼-弗里德（Sam Bankman-Fried）向陪审员提出要求 加密利他主义立场 FTX加密货币交易所的创始人山姆·班克曼-弗里德（Sam Bankman-Fried）提出了一个独特的想法来影响刑事审判中的陪审团选择. 他的目标是询问潜在的陪审员他们对加密利他主义的立场，这是指个人将其加密货币财富的很大一部分捐赠给慈善事业的想法。. 这种新颖的方法将使Bankman-Fried能够识别同情加密慈善价值观的陪审员，从而可能影响涉及加密货币相关犯罪的案件的结果。. Bankman-Fried认为，加密货币在现代社会中的突出地位使得在陪审团选择时必须包含特定于加密货币的问题。. 通过衡量潜在陪审员对加密利他主义的态度，他的目标是在涉及加密货币的案件中创建一个更加知情和公正的陪审团。. 这种方法可能对未来如何选择陪审团产生深远的影响，特别是在加密货币发挥重要作用的情况下。.

2. 其他细节：Bankman-Fried的提议得到了法律专家和加密货币爱好者的支持和批评。. 一些人认为，在陪审团选择期间纳入与加密相关的问题将增强小组对加密货币案件所涉及的复杂性的理解。. 他们认为，这将导致更公平和更明智的决定。. 另一方面，批评者认为，向潜在的陪审员询问他们对加密利他主义的立场可能会在陪审团选择过程中引入偏见。. 他们断言，陪审员的选择应该基于他们的公正性和客观评估案件事实的能力，而不是个人对加密货币或慈善事业的信念。. 他们还对法律诉讼的任何一方可能操纵陪审团表示担忧.

3. 主议题：对陪审团选择过程的影响 Sam Bankman-Fried提议向潜在陪审员询问他们对加密利他主义的看法，可能对陪审团选择过程产生重大影响. 通过纳入加密特定问题，法律体系将承认加密货币在现代社会中日益增长的影响力，并试图在涉及数字资产的案件中组建一个更知情的陪审团。. 这种方法将确保陪审员对加密货币概念有基本的了解，例如利他主义捐赠和数字财富对社会的潜在影响。. 它还可以为未来在评审团选择中纳入与技术、金融和其他新兴领域相关的其他具体问题铺平道路。. 然而，有人担心向陪审员询问他们对特定主题的看法会带来潜在的偏见。. 批评者认为，陪审团的选择应该优先考虑公正性和个人客观评估案件事实的能力，而不是个人对加密货币或慈善事业的信念。. 在确保公平审判和解决加密货币相关案件的复杂性之间取得平衡将是法律体系向前发展的一项具有挑战性的任务。. .


1. Main Topic: Sam Bankman-Fried's Bids to Ask Jurors Crypto Altruism Stance Sam Bankman-Fried,the founder of FTX cryptocurrency exchange,has proposed a unique idea to influence jury selection in criminal trials. He aims to ask potential jurors about their stance on crypto altruism,which refers to the idea of individuals giving away a significant portion of their cryptocurrency wealth to charitable causes. This novel approach would allow Bankman-Fried to identify jurors who are sympathetic to the values of crypto philanthropy,potentially impacting the outcome of cases involving cryptocurrency-related crimes. Bankman-Fried believes that the prominence of cryptocurrency in modern society necessitates the inclusion of crypto-specific questions during jury selection. By gauging potential jurors' attitudes towards crypto altruism,he aims to create a more informed and unbiased jury pool in cases that involve cryptocurrencies. This approach could have far-reaching implications for how juries are selected in the future,particularly in cases where cryptocurrency plays a significant role.

2. Additional Detail: Bankman-Fried's proposal has garnered both support and criticism from legal experts and cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Some argue that incorporating crypto-related questions during jury selection would enhance the panel's understanding of the intricacies involved in cases concerning cryptocurrencies. They contend that this would result in fairer and more informed decisions. On the other hand,critics argue that asking potential jurors about their stance on crypto altruism could introduce bias into the jury selection process. They assert that jurors should be selected based on their ability to be impartial and to evaluate the facts of the case objectively,rather than personal beliefs about cryptocurrency or philanthropy. They also raise concerns about potential manipulation of the jury pool by either side of the legal proceedings.

3. Main Topic: Impact on Jury Selection Process Sam Bankman-Fried's proposal to ask potential jurors about their views on crypto altruism could have significant implications for the jury selection process. By incorporating crypto-specific questions,the legal system would acknowledge the growing influence of cryptocurrencies in modern society and attempt to assemble a more informed jury in cases involving digital assets. This approach would ensure that jurors have a basic understanding of cryptocurrency concepts,such as altruistic giving and the potential impact of digital wealth on society. It could also pave the way for other specific questions related to technology,finance,and other emerging fields to be included during jury selection in the future. However,there are concerns about the potential bias introduced by asking jurors about their views on a specific topic. Critics argue that jury selection should prioritize impartiality and an individual's ability to assess the facts of the case objectively,rather than personal beliefs about cryptocurrency or philanthropy. Striking a balance between ensuring a fair trial and addressing the complexities of cryptocurrency-related cases will be a challenging task for the legal system moving forward.


Reference: cointelegraph.com