LBRY决定与区块链公司作斗争 向SEC提交上诉通知
(LBRY decides to fight Blockchain firm files notice of appeal against SEC)

Published: 2023-09-08


1. LBRY与SEC的斗争（主题1） LBRY是一个基于区块链的内容共享平台，已向美国证券交易委员会（SEC）提出上诉. 该公司旨在挑战美国证券交易委员会将其原生代币LBRY Credits（LBC）分类为证券。. LBRY认为LBC代币不是证券，而是在其去中心化内容市场中使用的实用代币。. 这一上诉标志着LBRY决心质疑SEC的监管并捍卫其技术的合法性。.

2. 实用代币与. 安全令牌辩论（主题2） LBRY案例突出了围绕将代币分类为实用代币或安全代币的持续辩论. 这种区别至关重要，因为实用型代币在网络中服务于实际目的，而安全型代币则代表传统资产或投资. LBRY的论点侧重于重申其LBC代币的实用性. 此案的结果可能对在灰色监管领域运营的其他区块链项目产生重大影响。.

3. 捍卫去中心化和内容自由（主题3） LBRY与SEC的斗争也强调了他们对去中心化内容共享和言论自由的承诺. 该公司认为，美国证券交易委员会试图监管其平台的尝试破坏了去中心化技术的理想。. LBRY旨在保护内容创建者和用户的权利，主张基于区块链的平台为传统的中心化系统提供了更公平，更透明的替代方案。. 本案引起了人们对监管机构与去中心化项目所倡导的原则之间潜在冲突的关注. 总之，LBRY对SEC将其代币归类为证券的上诉反映了该公司捍卫其技术合法性的决心。. 该案深入探讨了关于实用代币和安全代币之间区别的持续辩论. 此外，LBRY的立场强调了他们对内容共享空间内的权力下放和言论自由的承诺。. .


1. LBRY's Battle Against the SEC (Topic 1) LBRY,a blockchain-based content-sharing platform,has filed a notice of appeal against the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The company aims to challenge the SEC's classification of its native tokens,LBRY Credits (LBC),as securities. LBRY argues that LBC tokens are not securities but rather utility tokens used within their decentralized content marketplace. This appeal signifies LBRY's determination to contest the SEC's regulatory oversight and defend their technology's legitimacy.

2. The Utility Token vs. Security Token Debate (Topic 2) The LBRY case highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the classification of tokens as either utility tokens or security tokens. This distinction is crucial as utility tokens serve practical purposes within a network,unlike security tokens,which represent traditional assets or investments. LBRY's argument focuses on reaffirming the utility nature of their LBC tokens. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for other blockchain projects operating in gray regulatory areas.

3. Defending Decentralization and Content Freedom (Topic 3) LBRY's fight against the SEC also emphasizes their commitment to decentralized content sharing and freedom of expression. The company believes that the SEC's attempts to regulate their platform undermine the ideals of decentralized technology. LBRY aims to protect the rights of content creators and users,asserting that blockchain-based platforms offer a fairer,more transparent alternative to traditional centralized systems. This case brings attention to the potential clash between regulatory bodies and the principles championed by decentralized projects. In conclusion,LBRY's appeal against the SEC's classification of their tokens as securities reflects the company's determination to defend their technology's legitimacy. The case delves into the ongoing debate regarding the distinction between utility tokens and security tokens. Furthermore,LBRY's stance highlights their commitment to decentralization and the freedom of expression within the content-sharing space.


Reference: cointelegraph.com