控制论组织 BORG 注定要失败
(Cybernetic organizations BORGs are doomed to fail)
Published: 2023-06-13
1. 主主题:控制论组织的失败 本文深入探讨了DAO(去中心化自治组织)和智能合约等控制论组织容易失败的原因. 引用的主要原因之一是这些组织缺乏人为干预和决策。. 作者认为,他们基于代码的架构使他们容易受到黑客攻击,操纵和其他可能影响其性能的漏洞。.
2. 主題:過度依賴過度使用自動化的風險 本文還關注過度依賴自動化和算法來管理複雜系統的風險. 作者指出,自动化虽然可以提高效率,降低成本,但也可能导致意想不到的负面后果。. 例如,依靠自动驾驶汽车而不是人类驾驶员可能会导致可编程系统可能不知道如何处理的事故。. 最后,作者强调了在自动化和人为干预之间取得平衡的重要性。.
3. 主題:控制論組織的未來 本文結束了對控制論組織未來的討論. 虽然作者认为这些组织不太可能完全消失,但它们将不得不发展以应对当前模式的挑战。. 这可能包括更加强调人工输入,以及改进其安全性和漏洞协议。. 作者还建议,控制论组织可以从采用更灵活的结构中受益,这些结构允许根据不断变化的环境不断演变和修改。. .
1. Main topic: The Failures of Cybernetic Organizations The article delves into the reasons why cybernetic organizations such as DAOs (decentralized autonomous organizations) and smart contracts are prone to failure. One of the main reasons cited is the lack of human intervention and decision-making in these organizations. The author argues that their code-based architecture makes them vulnerable to hacking,manipulation,and other vulnerabilities that can affect their performance.
2. Main topic: The Risks of Over-reliance on Automation The article also focuses on the risks of relying too heavily on automation and algorithms to manage complex systems. The author points out that while automation can improve efficiency and reduce costs,it can also lead to unexpected and negative consequences. For example,relying on autonomous vehicles instead of human drivers can result in accidents that programmable systems may not know how to handle. Ultimately,the author highlights the importance of striking a balance between automation and human intervention.
3. Main topic: The Future of Cybernetic Organizations The article concludes with a discussion of the future of cybernetic organizations. While the author argues that it is unlikely that these organizations will completely disappear,they will have to evolve in order to address the challenges of their current model. This may include a greater emphasis on human input,as well as improvements to their security and vulnerability protocols. The author also suggests that cybernetic organizations could benefit from adopting more flexible structures that allow for constant evolution and modification based on changing circumstances.
Reference:
cointelegraph.com