Wanasheria wa SBFs wanataka kuuliza jurors juu ya altruism ya crypto na ADHD
(SBFs lawyers want to quiz jurors on crypto altruism and ADHD)

Published: 2023-09-13


1. Mada kuu: Sam Bankman-Fried's Bids kuuliza Jurors Crypto Altruism Stance Sam Bankman-Fried, mwanzilishi wa kubadilishana cryptocurrency FTX, amependekeza wazo la kipekee kushawishi uteuzi wa jury katika kesi za jinai. Anakusudia kuuliza jurors uwezo kuhusu msimamo wao juu ya crypto altruism, ambayo inahusu wazo la watu binafsi kutoa sehemu kubwa ya utajiri wao cryptocurrency kwa sababu za hisani. Njia hii ya riwaya ingeruhusu Bankman-Fried kutambua majaji ambao wana huruma kwa maadili ya uhisani wa crypto, kwa kweli kuathiri matokeo ya kesi zinazohusisha uhalifu unaohusiana na cryptocurrency. Bankman-Fried anaamini kuwa umaarufu wa cryptocurrency katika jamii ya kisasa inahitaji kuingizwa kwa maswali maalum ya crypto wakati wa uteuzi wa jury. Kwa gauging uwezo wa jurors 'mitazamo kuelekea crypto altruism, yeye inalenga kujenga zaidi taarifa na unbiased jury pool katika kesi ambazo zinahusisha cryptocurrencies. Njia hii inaweza kuwa na athari kubwa kwa jinsi wanasheria wanachaguliwa katika siku zijazo, hasa katika kesi ambapo cryptocurrency ina jukumu kubwa.

2. Maelezo ya ziada: Pendekezo la Bankman-Fried limepata msaada na ukosoaji kutoka kwa wataalam wa kisheria na wapenzi wa cryptocurrency. Wengine wanasema kuwa kuingiza maswali yanayohusiana na crypto wakati wa uteuzi wa jury kutaongeza uelewa wa jopo la ugumu unaohusika katika kesi zinazohusiana na pesa za sarafu. Wanadai kuwa hii itasababisha maamuzi ya haki na ya busara zaidi. Kwa upande mwingine, wakosoaji wanasema kuwa kuuliza jurors uwezo kuhusu msimamo wao juu ya crypto altruism inaweza kuanzisha upendeleo katika mchakato wa uteuzi wa jury. Wanadai kwamba majaji wanapaswa kuchaguliwa kulingana na uwezo wao wa kuwa na upendeleo na kutathmini ukweli wa kesi kwa usahihi, badala ya imani ya kibinafsi kuhusu cryptocurrency au uhisani. Pia wanaibua wasiwasi juu ya uwezekano wa kudanganywa kwa bwawa la jury kwa upande wowote wa kesi za kisheria.

3. Mada kuu: Athari juu ya Mchakato wa Uteuzi wa Jury Pendekezo la Sam Bankman-Fried kuuliza majaji wenye uwezo juu ya maoni yao juu ya altruism ya crypto inaweza kuwa na athari kubwa kwa mchakato wa uteuzi wa jury. Kwa kuingiza maswali maalum ya crypto, mfumo wa kisheria utakubali ushawishi unaoongezeka wa pesa za sarafu katika jamii ya kisasa na kujaribu kukusanya jury zaidi katika kesi zinazohusisha mali za dijiti. Njia hii itahakikisha kuwa jurors wana uelewa wa msingi wa dhana za cryptocurrency, kama vile utoaji wa altruistic na athari za uwezo wa utajiri wa digital kwa jamii. Inaweza pia kufungua njia kwa maswali mengine maalum yanayohusiana na teknolojia, fedha, na nyanja zingine zinazojitokeza kujumuishwa wakati wa uteuzi wa jury katika siku zijazo. Hata hivyo, kuna wasiwasi juu ya upendeleo unaowezekana ulioletwa kwa kuuliza majaji juu ya maoni yao juu ya mada maalum. Wakosoaji wanasema kuwa uteuzi wa jury unapaswa kuweka kipaumbele kutokuwa na upendeleo na uwezo wa mtu binafsi wa kutathmini ukweli wa kesi kwa usahihi, badala ya imani ya kibinafsi juu ya cryptocurrency au uhisani. Kupiga usawa kati ya kuhakikisha kesi ya haki na kushughulikia ugumu wa kesi zinazohusiana na cryptocurrency itakuwa kazi ngumu kwa mfumo wa kisheria kusonga mbele.. .


1. Main Topic: Sam Bankman-Fried's Bids to Ask Jurors Crypto Altruism Stance Sam Bankman-Fried,the founder of FTX cryptocurrency exchange,has proposed a unique idea to influence jury selection in criminal trials. He aims to ask potential jurors about their stance on crypto altruism,which refers to the idea of individuals giving away a significant portion of their cryptocurrency wealth to charitable causes. This novel approach would allow Bankman-Fried to identify jurors who are sympathetic to the values of crypto philanthropy,potentially impacting the outcome of cases involving cryptocurrency-related crimes. Bankman-Fried believes that the prominence of cryptocurrency in modern society necessitates the inclusion of crypto-specific questions during jury selection. By gauging potential jurors' attitudes towards crypto altruism,he aims to create a more informed and unbiased jury pool in cases that involve cryptocurrencies. This approach could have far-reaching implications for how juries are selected in the future,particularly in cases where cryptocurrency plays a significant role.

2. Additional Detail: Bankman-Fried's proposal has garnered both support and criticism from legal experts and cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Some argue that incorporating crypto-related questions during jury selection would enhance the panel's understanding of the intricacies involved in cases concerning cryptocurrencies. They contend that this would result in fairer and more informed decisions. On the other hand,critics argue that asking potential jurors about their stance on crypto altruism could introduce bias into the jury selection process. They assert that jurors should be selected based on their ability to be impartial and to evaluate the facts of the case objectively,rather than personal beliefs about cryptocurrency or philanthropy. They also raise concerns about potential manipulation of the jury pool by either side of the legal proceedings.

3. Main Topic: Impact on Jury Selection Process Sam Bankman-Fried's proposal to ask potential jurors about their views on crypto altruism could have significant implications for the jury selection process. By incorporating crypto-specific questions,the legal system would acknowledge the growing influence of cryptocurrencies in modern society and attempt to assemble a more informed jury in cases involving digital assets. This approach would ensure that jurors have a basic understanding of cryptocurrency concepts,such as altruistic giving and the potential impact of digital wealth on society. It could also pave the way for other specific questions related to technology,finance,and other emerging fields to be included during jury selection in the future. However,there are concerns about the potential bias introduced by asking jurors about their views on a specific topic. Critics argue that jury selection should prioritize impartiality and an individual's ability to assess the facts of the case objectively,rather than personal beliefs about cryptocurrency or philanthropy. Striking a balance between ensuring a fair trial and addressing the complexities of cryptocurrency-related cases will be a challenging task for the legal system moving forward.


Reference: cointelegraph.com

Habari za Marekani ambayo ina athari kubwa kwenye soko

katika	habari	siku	tarehe	wakati
1	Ripoti ya Kila Mwezi ya Maagizo ya Bidhaa Zinazodumu (Core Durable Goods Orders m/m)	Ijumaa (Fri)	24-05-2024	15:30
2	Maagizo ya kila mwezi ya bidhaa za kudumu (Durable Goods Orders m/m)	Ijumaa (Fri)	24-05-2024	15:30
3	Taarifa ya Mwanachama wa FED (Christopher J. Waller). (FOMC Member Waller Speaks)	Ijumaa (Fri)	24-05-2024	16:35
4	Kuboresha Nambari za Kielezo cha Imani ya Mtumiaji (Revised UoM Consumer Sentiment)	Ijumaa (Fri)	24-05-2024	17:00
5	Ripoti ya Mfumuko wa Bei inayotarajiwa kutoka Chuo Kikuu cha Michigan (Revised UoM Inflation Expectations)	Ijumaa (Fri)	24-05-2024	17:00