![Kesi ya BitGos 100M dhidi ya Galaxy inaweza kuendelea Mahakama Kuu ya Delaware - BitGos 100M suit against Galaxy can proceed Delaware Supreme Court Kesi ya BitGos 100M dhidi ya Galaxy inaweza kuendelea Mahakama Kuu ya Delaware - BitGos 100M suit against Galaxy can proceed Delaware Supreme Court](https://titdoi.com/news-images/BitGos-100M-suit-against-Galaxy-can-proceed-Delaware-Supreme-Court.webp)
Kesi ya BitGos 100M dhidi ya Galaxy inaweza kuendelea Mahakama Kuu ya Delaware
(BitGos 100M suit against Galaxy can proceed Delaware Supreme Court)
Published: 2024-05-25
1. Sheria kati ya BitGo na Galaxy Digital: Lengo kuu la makala linahusu kesi kati ya BitGo na Galaxy Digital. BitGo imefungua kesi dhidi ya Galaxy Digital katika Mahakama Kuu ya Delaware juu ya uvunjaji wa mkataba unaohusiana na makubaliano ya muungano. BitGo inadai kuwa Galaxy Digital haikutimiza majukumu yake, wakati Galaxy Digital inasema kuwa BitGo ilipata athari mbaya ya nyenzo ambayo inaipa haki ya kusitisha makubaliano.
2. Uvunjaji wa madai ya mkataba: Kulingana na BitGo,Galaxy Digital ilishindwa kufikia masharti fulani yaliyoainishwa katika makubaliano ya muungano, na kusababisha uvunjaji wa mkataba. BitGo inashikilia kuwa jaribio la Galaxy Digital la kusitisha makubaliano hayo ni la haki na inashikilia kuwa itafuatilia hatua za kisheria kutekeleza masharti ya awali ya mpango huo..
3. Kifungu cha athari mbaya ya nyenzo: Galaxy Digital inadai kuwa athari mbaya ya nyenzo ilitokea ambayo inaruhusu kurudi nje ya makubaliano ya muungano. Kifungu hiki kinawezesha chama kujiondoa kutoka kwa mpango ikiwa kuna mabadiliko makubwa hasi katika utendaji wa kifedha wa kampuni inayolengwa au vipimo vingine muhimu. Galaxy Digital inadai kuwa athari kama hiyo ilifanyika, ikirekebisha uamuzi wake wa kusitisha makubaliano na kusababisha mzozo wa kisheria na BitGo.. .
1. Lawsuit between BitGo and Galaxy Digital: The main focus of the article revolves around the lawsuit between BitGo and Galaxy Digital. BitGo has filed a suit against Galaxy Digital in the Delaware Supreme Court over breach of contract related to a merger agreement. BitGo claims that Galaxy Digital did not fulfill its obligations,while Galaxy Digital argues that BitGo experienced a material adverse effect that gives it the right to terminate the agreement.
2. Breach of contract allegations: According to BitGo,Galaxy Digital failed to meet certain conditions specified in the merger agreement,leading to a breach of contract. BitGo contends that Galaxy Digital's attempt to terminate the agreement is unjustified and maintains that it will pursue legal action to enforce the original terms of the deal.
3. Material adverse effect clause: Galaxy Digital asserts that a material adverse effect occurred that allows it to back out of the merger agreement. This clause enables a party to withdraw from a deal if there is a significant negative change in the target company's financial performance or other key metrics. Galaxy Digital claims that such an effect took place,justifying its decision to terminate the agreement and prompting the legal dispute with BitGo.
Reference:
cointelegraph.com