LBRY memutuskan untuk melawan firma Blockchain memfailkan notis rayuan terhadap SEC
(LBRY decides to fight Blockchain firm files notice of appeal against SEC)
Published: 2023-09-08
. . Syarikat ini bertujuan untuk mencabar klasifikasi SEC token asalnya, LBRY Credits (LBC), sebagai sekuriti. LBRY berhujah bahawa token LBC bukan sekuriti tetapi token utiliti yang digunakan dalam pasaran kandungan terdesentralisasi mereka. Rayuan ini menandakan keazaman LBRY untuk mempertikaikan pengawasan kawal selia SEC dan mempertahankan kesahihan teknologi mereka.
2. Token Utiliti lwn. Perbahasan Token Keselamatan (Topik 2) Kes LBRY menyerlahkan perdebatan berterusan mengenai klasifikasi token sebagai sama ada token utiliti atau token keselamatan. Perbezaan ini penting kerana token utiliti memenuhi tujuan praktikal dalam rangkaian, tidak seperti token keselamatan, yang mewakili aset atau pelaburan tradisional. . Hasil kes ini boleh memberi implikasi yang signifikan terhadap projek blockchain lain yang beroperasi di kawasan pengawalseliaan kelabu.
3. Mempertahankan Desentralisasi dan Kebebasan Kandungan (Topik 3) Perjuangan LBRY terhadap SEC juga menekankan komitmen mereka terhadap perkongsian kandungan terdesentralisasi dan kebebasan bersuara. . LBRY bertujuan untuk melindungi hak pencipta kandungan dan pengguna, menegaskan bahawa platform berasaskan blockchain menawarkan alternatif yang lebih adil dan telus kepada sistem berpusat tradisional. Kes ini membawa perhatian kepada potensi pertembungan antara badan kawal selia dan prinsip-prinsip yang diperjuangkan oleh projek-projek terdesentralisasi. Kesimpulannya, rayuan LBRY terhadap klasifikasi SEC token mereka sebagai sekuriti mencerminkan keazaman syarikat untuk mempertahankan kesahihan teknologi mereka. Kes ini membincangkan perdebatan berterusan mengenai perbezaan antara token utiliti dan token keselamatan. Tambahan pula, pendirian LBRY menyerlahkan komitmen mereka terhadap desentralisasi dan kebebasan bersuara dalam ruang perkongsian kandungan.. .
1. LBRY's Battle Against the SEC (Topic 1) LBRY,a blockchain-based content-sharing platform,has filed a notice of appeal against the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The company aims to challenge the SEC's classification of its native tokens,LBRY Credits (LBC),as securities. LBRY argues that LBC tokens are not securities but rather utility tokens used within their decentralized content marketplace. This appeal signifies LBRY's determination to contest the SEC's regulatory oversight and defend their technology's legitimacy.
2. The Utility Token vs. Security Token Debate (Topic 2) The LBRY case highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the classification of tokens as either utility tokens or security tokens. This distinction is crucial as utility tokens serve practical purposes within a network,unlike security tokens,which represent traditional assets or investments. LBRY's argument focuses on reaffirming the utility nature of their LBC tokens. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for other blockchain projects operating in gray regulatory areas.
3. Defending Decentralization and Content Freedom (Topic 3) LBRY's fight against the SEC also emphasizes their commitment to decentralized content sharing and freedom of expression. The company believes that the SEC's attempts to regulate their platform undermine the ideals of decentralized technology. LBRY aims to protect the rights of content creators and users,asserting that blockchain-based platforms offer a fairer,more transparent alternative to traditional centralized systems. This case brings attention to the potential clash between regulatory bodies and the principles championed by decentralized projects. In conclusion,LBRY's appeal against the SEC's classification of their tokens as securities reflects the company's determination to defend their technology's legitimacy. The case delves into the ongoing debate regarding the distinction between utility tokens and security tokens. Furthermore,LBRY's stance highlights their commitment to decentralization and the freedom of expression within the content-sharing space.
Reference:
cointelegraph.com